<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PACT Act Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drsnus.com/pact-act-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drsnus.com/pact-act-update/</link>
	<description>The #1 site on the web for snus news, snus reviews and snus humor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:35:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.drsnus.com/pact-act-update/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drsnus.com/?p=991#comment-440</guid>
		<description>The way the PACT Act reads right now, it is my understanding that legally operating online tobacco shops who are licensed , and abide by the provisions in the act such as collection of state taxes and proper age verification, would still legally be able to ship Snus to consumers.  You can find this in the Non-Mailable section which shows Exemptions, which are Cigars, Alaska and Hawaii, and Business dealing in wholesale, import, ect, as well as &quot;non commercial&quot; mailings.  I think the act basically is in place to punish sites who sale with out enforcing tax laws or age checks. Web sites like Getsnus.com however should still be ok as they do charge tax, they would just have label their shipments to require age checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way the PACT Act reads right now, it is my understanding that legally operating online tobacco shops who are licensed , and abide by the provisions in the act such as collection of state taxes and proper age verification, would still legally be able to ship Snus to consumers.  You can find this in the Non-Mailable section which shows Exemptions, which are Cigars, Alaska and Hawaii, and Business dealing in wholesale, import, ect, as well as &#8220;non commercial&#8221; mailings.  I think the act basically is in place to punish sites who sale with out enforcing tax laws or age checks. Web sites like Getsnus.com however should still be ok as they do charge tax, they would just have label their shipments to require age checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason (Veganpunk)</title>
		<link>http://www.drsnus.com/pact-act-update/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason (Veganpunk)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drsnus.com/?p=991#comment-435</guid>
		<description>I hate our government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate our government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.drsnus.com/pact-act-update/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drsnus.com/?p=991#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Picking up my freezer this weekend, found a huge one for a very affordable price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picking up my freezer this weekend, found a huge one for a very affordable price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

